Smartphone Performance Review

Smartphone Performance Review – Qualcomm’s “Smartphone for Snapdragon Insider” benchmark and review summary reveals current device’s CPU performance

Launched on August 27, 2021. ASUS designed and manufactured it, and I was able to touch the smartphone with Qualcomm’s “Snapdragon 888” SoC built-in, then I tested its computing performance with the standard reference software “Geekbench 5”.

Smartphone Performance Review

I compared the camera performance of the “Smartphone for Snapdragon Insider”, described as “superior to the iPhone 12 Pro Max” —

Google Pixel 4a Review: Just Enough Smartphone For Most

For Snapdragon Insider smartphones, such as setting things related to battery consumption, “high performance” suitable for applications with high specification requirements, “dynamic” recommended for general use, and “power saving” to achieve both performance and driving time. Since there is a feature called system mode that allows you to select “ultra power saving” which conserves energy as much as possible, switch it to “high performance mode” before starting the benchmark.

With the Snapdragon Insider’s smartphone score being ‘5749’, a poor score with the Samsung Galaxy S21 series sitting at the top spot.

, with a computing power of 26 trillion times per second (26TOPS). Therefore, I tried to use “Geekbench ML”, a benchmark that tests the AI ​​performance of mobile devices.

Below is a comparison chart of Geekbench ML benchmark results. The top is probably a special place for Apple devices, and the top for Android was “444” for the Galaxy S21, so it seems that the Snapdragon Insider smartphone has the same first-class AI performance as an Android smartphone.

Oneplus 8 Review

The comparison chart on the official website looks like this. The iPad is the only device rated higher than a smartphone by Snapdragon Insider, so it has the highest score for a non-tablet smartphone device.

The ‘Snapdragon Insider smartphone’ has solid core performance such as a 6.78-inch display with a 144Hz refresh rate, 16GB RAM, 512GB storage, and can be used in a variety of scenarios from daily use to gaming and photography. It is a high-end smartphone that supports 5G.

And Xiaomi announced a policy of not connecting one charging adapter after another, a charging adapter compatible with the “Quick Charge 5” fast charging standard and wireless headsets with a charging case included as standard. In addition, since the so-called pure Android 11 is accepted as an application, which is not pre-installed or customized by manufacturers’ applications that are often used less often, “I want a pure Android terminal, but the Google Pixel. series does not have the power. It is convenient for users who said.

On the other hand, the highest price of 164,880 yen including tax is a bottle. It also does not have the functions that many high-end smartphones have, such as the specification of dust protection / waterproofing and wireless charging, and even though it is the first smartphone of Qualcomm, it has a sensor in the middle of the fingerprint screen of ‘Qualcomm Gen 3D sonic sensor 2’. No, the SoC is not the “Snapdragon 888 Plus” that was announced in June 2021, but the “Snapdragon 888” that was announced in December 2020, and it is disappointing that the unique power of Qualcomm is not good enough. I’m also concerned that it hasn’t been officially announced at the time of writing whether it will support Android 12, due out in 2021.

Iphone Se Review: The ‘ideal’ Smartphone Size With The Performance Of An Iphone 6s

Therefore, it is important to decide if you are attracted by the high level of performance of the SoC and the fact that you can have a complete set of Qualcomm from the charger to the earphones without buying additional accessories. I felt that was an important factor. It’s no secret that Sony’s smartphone business is in trouble. Competition has intensified over the past few years, with continued innovation and low prices creating problems for market operators. Instead of doubling down on their flagship products, like HTC did with their excellent HTC 10, Sony seems happy to keep up with small iterations year after year.

The new Xperia X series may not have the same name as its predecessor, the Xperia Z, but you shouldn’t confuse these products with a revolutionary change. I tested the high-end Xperia X Performance for a few weeks and found it to be remarkably similar to its predecessor, the Xperia Z5. Considering the Z5 was the 6th offshoot of the 3-year-old Xperia Z, it’s easy to feel that this design is becoming outdated.

The similarities between the Xperia X Performance and the Xperia Z1 in particular are striking. Released in 2013, the Xperia Z1 has a 5.0-inch 1080p display; in 2016 we still see a 5.0-inch 1080p display on the X Performance. Both phones are water resistant. Both phones have over 20 megapixel cameras and both have dedicated shutter buttons.

So what has Sony managed to achieve in three years? However, the Xperia X Performance ditches the Snapdragon 800 SoC for the modern Snapdragon 820, bringing better connectivity, more storage, and more RAM. The front-facing camera is now up to 13 megapixels, while Sony says the rear camera is the fastest yet. Shockingly, we get a small battery in an equally thick phone. We also get new software features as well.

Poco X3 First Impressions: The Heavyweight Performance Smartphone Under Rs 20,000

When I first picked up the Xperia X Performance at MWC 2016, and again for this review, I couldn’t help but feel that the design was a bit underwhelming. I saw this kind of smartphone style from Sony three years ago, and it seems that while the competitors are slim and good-looking, Sony’s designers have gone backwards.

There are very few features of the Xperia X Performance that are more attractive than the design of my favorite Sony smartphone – the Xperia Z3. Since that phone was released in 2014, Sony’s flagship device has gained a millimeter in thickness, lost the comfortable curved edges, and replaced high-quality materials with plastic in some areas.

On Sony’s product page, the company is quick to highlight the shiny metal panel, which I have to admit looks good thanks to the subtle finishing and minimal distractions, but the plastic edges let this phone down; they look cheap and don’t deliver the same textual excitement. Sony tried to color these edges to match the look of the back panel, but that didn’t work: the visible seam that joins the back panel to the sides is invisible, and the difference in brightness between metal and plastic is noticeable.

Placed next to the similar Huawei P9, it’s clear what Sony should have done in designing the Xperia X Performance. The P9’s metal unibody looks and feels great, as premium materials curve seamlessly around the edges. The change of Xperia X Performance from metal to plastic looks ugly in comparison and gives the impression that Sony’s creation is a very cheap device.

Nokia 8 Sirocco Performance Review: Heavy Gaming, Browsing, & Multitasking Hands On

The metal back has its advantages. There are no antenna lines that are usually required in unibody designs and can interfere with styling. The Xperia X Performance is also easier to hold than its predecessor in the Xperia Z series, which used a fragile glass back that is prone to cracking, and a slippery fingerprint.

The front panel consists of a glass plate that protects the display, which curves slightly towards the edges, creating a smooth feel. The bezels are the average size of a 5-inch smartphone and are colored to match the edges and back panel. I’m not a fan of this one-tone design – it looks boring – and the rose gold model I received for review is not something I usually choose to buy. That said, the X Performance is also available in white, black and “standing gold”.

The Xperia X Performance is one of the few remaining flagships to contain two front-facing speakers, providing a stereo experience when watching videos and playing games. I love stereo speakers on the front of smartphones and it’s sad to see companies like HTC move away from that. The quality of the X Performance speakers is not very good, but their volume is decent, and I don’t expect amazing sound from such small drivers.

At the bottom end of the Xperia X Performance is a small USB port, which is disappointing when most high-end devices have switched to the more versatile USB-C port. Samsung is another from here, as they have their Gear VR system that still uses micro-USB. Sony doesn’t have such a thing, so I wonder why they haven’t upgraded their charging and data port to be more modern.

Honor 6x Review: Solid Performance At A Hard To Beat Price

The top edge houses the 3.5mm headphone jack, while the left edge has a tray for two nano-SIMs or a slot for nano-SIM and microSD cards. Nice to see dual-SIM functionality here, as it’s not usually found in high-end smartphones.

On the right edge is the fingerprint sensor, which doubles as the power button. I was criticizing the fingerprint sensor of the Xperia Z5 in this position because it seemed to work poorly, but these problems have been fixed in the Xperia X Performance.

This sensor is faster to use, more accurate than its previous implementation,